|
Honest to God - Forty Years On |
|
The
Cathedral welcomed a huge number of the clergy from the Diocese for the
Bishop's Clergy Study Day on Thursday 20 March. The choice of date was not
accidental for this day marked forty years to the day from the publication of
Bishop John Robinson's Honest to God.
Designed
to concentrate on the current state of play with regard to the issues raised by
the book, a number of eminent theologians had been asked to come to address the
gathering.
The day
was chaired by Rt Rev Richard Cheetham, Bishop of Kingston, who began by
introducing Colin Buchanan, Bishop of Woolwich and Martyn Percy, Director of
the Lincoln Theological Institute and Senior Lecturer at Sheffield University.
Bishop
Colin noted that forty years ago curates were told to ignore the Bishop of
Woolwich and 'wondered how many did this now!' He said that he had got used to
being the Bishop of Woolwich and that all this talk of controversy forty years
ago felt strange. In looking at Honest to God's attempt to relate doctrine to
contemporary thought he felt that on the whole it was luck that had made the
book so popular at the time.
Martyn
Percy concurred, remarking that 'when one looks at the book now one is tempted
to ask what all the fuss was about'. He spoke of a book which some thought
'woolly' and which is really nothing more than 'John Robinson thinking out
loud', but said it was 'a sincere and honest book'.
Questions followed in which the speakers were asked to see if there were
lessons for today's world in the book and whether it had helped to make more
Christians.
After
coffee Don Cupitt, Fellow of Emmanuel, Cambridge, and Christopher Ryan, Dean of
King's College, Cambridge, addressed the issue of God-language in 'Honest to
God' and God-language now. Don Cupitt felt that John Robinson was trying to
find a new language for God after Nietzsche's 'death of God' writings and spoke
about the influence of Buber and Bultmann and other contemporary writers on
Robinson. Christopher Ryan suggested that in many ways language was irrelevant
to Honest to God as Bishop John seemed to think that he could change the way in
which people spoke of things without changing their content.
He
introduced a note of poetry to the day, with a wide-ranging talk encompassing
Dante as well as the twentieth century. He addressed the question of whether -
as Vatican II believed - you can change how something is said without changing
what is said and gave a lovely picture of what he called the geology of the
spirit, with the clear water of content running under the fixed form of
language.
After
lunch, Trevor Hart, Prof. of Divinity and Principal of St Mary's College,
University of St Andrew sharpened this distinction by reminding us that we
always know that the words we use to speak of God are inadequate but that we
need more than silence when we speak of faith.
The
concluding session took the form of a dialogue between Jane Williams and
Alistair McGrath, Prof. of Historical Theology and Principal of Wycliffe Hall,
Oxford. Dr Williams, until recently Tutor in Doctrine at Trinity College,
Bristol, gave a delightfully self-effacing and human side to Bishop
Robinson.
He had,
she told the audience, with the utmost professionalism slept through
undergraduate and graduate papers she had read to him - and always asked the
most impossible to answer questions!
Their
dialogue left the audience with the challenging question: do you believe that
God does anything, and in the circumstances in the world on which the day was
held, it was a question as challenging as Honest to God itself.
Expanded versions of the day will be published by SCM (the publishers of Honest
to God) in the autumn. |